Some argue that manual port forwarding is better for your internet connection speed, since UPnP causes lag. To refresh the NAT table on a router where UPnP is already enabled, you need to disable UPnP, save your changes, and then power cycle your router. In some scenarios, you may be able to resolve connectivity issues by refreshing the Network Address Translation (NAT) table. Select the Enable Upstream QoS (Optimized for Gaming) check box.Enter the router user name and password.Launch a web browser from a computer or mobile device that is connected to your router’s network.To enable upstream QoS on your NETGEAR router: How do I optimize my Netgear router for gaming? It is also required if you are simultaneously using more than one game console or game online. Should UPnP be on or off for gaming?Įnable UPnP Because every service requires a different set of ports to be opened, this is the easiest way to ensure a properly opened NAT for gaming. This technology, which is also called an application-level gateway, is available on most commercial routers, and it helps users more reliably initiate SIP calls, even when behind a LAN with a secure firewall configuration. SIP ALG is the session initiation protocol application layer gateway. Navigate to Setup > WAN Setup on the Menu.Log in to the router – The default login is admin / admin.Open the Router’s Configuration Page – by default.Reading through it looks like a pretty good discussion about what I've said above, and has some examples showing the SDP changes.How do I disable SIP ALG on Netgear router? You might also find SBC systems which have TURN servers and such as features of the entire package. If the endpoints support things like ICE, TURN, and STUN then you might be able to do away with needing this SBC. It would probably need to act as a SIP proxy as well as a media proxy, creating listeners configured to accept media into a port on the external side and forward it onwards into the internal network. So alternatively you might want to pull the NAT handling logic away from the remote network back towards your own network to do this you need some NAT-aware SIP system (a Session Border Controller, or SBC). And if you've got SIP over TLS link (my SIP stuff at home only speaks TLS and SRTP to our SIP edge device) then they're completely useless anyway. Once stuff is NATted, then the messages sent by the endpoint might find that the source address and port gets changed, and those ports embedded in the SDP won't match up with what is coming out of the NAT, hence the use of the ALG in the router - since it's doing the NATing it should be able to rewrite the SIP no problem, right? But they do screw up, there can be incompatibilities with some funky SIP call flows, etc. For example, it would be great within an enterprise network but once you need to break out onto the internet to support homeworkers or business-to-business SIP federation then you might find that the ports get messed up. This is great when the endpoints have layer-three reachability with nothing in the way that's screwing with the ports and stuff. These ports, and the systems IP address, are then embedded into the SDP payload of the call setup messages, and sent on to the peer the endpoint speaks to the callee receives the SDP and will send media to the locations within. This is generally determined by the software running on the endpoint, which might pick from a pre-determined range, or it might use other ports (i.e. The main problem is that the signalling of the calls embeds addresses and ports declaring where media should be sent by the far end UA. There exist various protocols and software to make working around NATs a possibility without relying on the inconsistent behaviour of the different ALGs. SIP is very finicky when NATs come into the mix. Considering it seems custom made to solve these NAT traversal issues, does anyone know why the consensus is to disable? The only thing I found was ALG's don't work with TLS encrypted calls, which we do not have. I see her modem has a SIP ALG option, but everything I read online simply says that SIP ALG's are evil and to disable it. (Legitimate complaints too, this user is reliable and we tested.) For the past year, I have fiddled around with Port Forwarding and DMZ'ing the phone, each seemed to work decently but I'd still get about a complaint per month. Her ISP is Verizon Fios and she has the standard ActionTec MI424WR-GEN2 modem that came with the service. We have about 20 remote users, and while some of them have had a problem or two, this woman has an exceptional amount. Over the past year or so, I have been dealing with very intermittent and frustrating problems helping a remote user use her Cisco SIP phone with our internally hosted Asterisk server.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |